Share Posted May 23, 2018 When checking this simple animation in the latest Firefox Windows I'm seeing a lot of "jaggies" in the images. Anybody experiencing something like that? See the Pen MGdWKE?editors=0010 by emmanuelulloa (@emmanuelulloa) on CodePen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 Attached is how it renders the animation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Share Posted May 24, 2018 I haven't noticed anything like that. We really try to keep these forums focused on GSAP-specific questions. Got one of those? Looks like you're using only CSS transitions in that codepen. You're fired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Share Posted May 24, 2018 I used to have problems like that. Updating my graphics driver fixed the problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 2 hours ago, GreenSock said: I haven't noticed anything like that. We really try to keep these forums focused on GSAP-specific questions. Got one of those? Looks like you're using only CSS transitions in that codepen. You're fired Sorry Jack. I tried to do it with CSS just to confirm that GSAP was not the issue and it was more related to the FF rendering engine. It is for a client with is own CDN and since I cannot bring in GSAP anyways I had to do it with CSS to stay within my 150 kb limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Share Posted May 24, 2018 I suppose you're forgiven, @emmanuelulloa Did you know that GSAP is whitelisted on EVERY major ad network? So its file size doesn't count against you. We went to bat for ad developers years ago and all the ad networks recognized that GSAP is kind of a defacto standard in the industry, so they saw the value of whitelisting it. We explained why that was so important here: https://greensock.com/kilobyte-conundrum/ https://greensock.com/html5-banners Hopefully your client sees the value as well and will offer GSAP on their CDN without counting file size against you. Refer them to those articles if they push back Cheers! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Author Share Posted May 24, 2018 Just in case changing from <img> to <div> with background-image fixes the issue. Apparently rendering of combined images (one on top of the other) is treated differently by the engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now